I think the confusion comes from the fact that version 1.1.2 is a \'gold master\' and that 2.0 is still a release candite. The bold letters below the download links are referring to the 1.1.2 release, not the 2.0. A simple inversion of the download links so that the 1.1.2 link and text are back together would help.
-j Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:29:58 -0500 From: Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [porting-dev] the Mac OS X download page On 12/8/05, Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > *The advanced build is still being qualified but should work well. Use with > > caution and report bugs to the dev at > > porting.openoffice.org<[email protected]>list > > not misleading - as it says use with caution and report bugs It *is* misleading to say that, and then claim it to be "gold master" - it can\'t be both full of known bugs and a final gold release status. Either its in testing, or its released - it can\'t be both. > And now, the 2.0 X11 build is "still being > > qualified" and cannot be, therefore, called a "gold-master release". -- - Chad Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
