Hi,
James McKenzie a écrit :
You assume (in my case) this is correct. I think that sitting around
berating each other is a serious waste of time and effort that could
move the OpenOffice.org Mac Porting way ahead of where it is today. I
see this in the open war of words between Eric Bachard and Patrick
Luby.
Please stop it : there is no "open war of words" between me and Patrick
Luby.
I have even proposed to work together (see link above), just after Koper
conferences.
Patrick has contributed back, on several occassions, his fixes.
Yes, of course.
Take a
look at the macxjoin1153 cws for a good example. Efforts to incorporate
these fixes were halted when the 1.1.x code was basically abandoned.
No, most of this code cannot be used with 2.0. Tino and me have tried,
really.
Patrick continues to contribute back code when/where it is applicable
(you don't want multiple IZs for the same problem with attachments.)
This is within the spirit and intent of both the GPL and LGPL.
Yes, I completely agree. macosxjoin couldn't be integrated because so
much things changed. I'm even trying to adapt nfs problem we currently
have (when $HOME is remote), and this part will use Patrick's donation
(adapted).
We should work together,
Interesting ...
I believe in synergy and at the present time
Interesting again ...
that exists in two different groups. Place both groups together, and
the amount of individual effort required decreases, bugs and other
problems will be solved much quicker and EVERYONE gets recognized for a
very fine job.
Propose to work together ? I already did. :
<http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=2038&sid=0a1a1758e2e279cb0d43c0fa83ef81cb>
Regards,
eric bachard
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Francophone OpenOffice.org Commmunity developer (Linux PPC / Mac OS X /
X11)
See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
