[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15742951#comment-15742951
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-47:
-----------------------------------

Github user pferrel commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/328
  
    too much noise in @dev, I have a simple question. 
    
    If I train on one machine, how do I deploy on another. Currently I copy the 
manifest--well actually the entire directory--from the train machine to the 
deploy machine. 
    
    This is actually a very important use case because the train machine has 
the Spark driver on it so it may have to be very large (and temporary, but the 
deploy machine can be smaller and far cheaper. Not to mention having multiple 
PredictionServers behind a load balancer.


> Remove engine manifest for stateless build
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIO-47
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-47
>             Project: PredictionIO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Chan
>
> As discussed in the dev mailing list, removing engine manifest would be the 
> first step in improving the workflow towards a more modular design. 
> - Remove manifest.json completely. `pio build` will be stateless, and will 
> not write anything to the database. This will make it easier to compile/build 
> on PaaS platforms such as Heroku. Later, we can remove `pio build` command 
> entirely, so that PIO is independent of the build tool (sbt).
> - An immediate major disadvantage would be not being able to run pio commands 
> outside of the engine directory. This can be resolved in the next step of 
> creating a general metadata registry.
> - Meanwhile, we can use engineFactory as *engineId* , and SHA-1 hash of 
> engine filepath as *engineVersion* (as before). We can improve this when 
> designing a metadata registry, 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to