Show me where the code is that commits to the asf-site branch.

> On Nov 17, 2021, at 12:25 PM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with that.
> 
> I understand that there are tradeoffs for each approach, though the
> original intention was to allow for doc changes to be committed in the
> same PR as the code change. That doesn't have to be the case always,
> especially for larger multi-PR changes, but it makes it easier to do
> quick corrections to the docs.
> 
> I think the bigger problem here is to get rid of the generated site
> HTML stuff from the main pulsar repo.
> 
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> 
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:16 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dave,
>> Having a new repo will make it harder for developers to contribute
>> documentation.
>> 
>> Usually engineers do  it like and do not have time to write docs.
>> 
>> If we ask them to create two PRs only to add, for instance, a new
>> configuration option, then it would be somehow a pain.
>> 
>> I am not saying that we shouldn't go this way, but it would be kind of a
>> pain for someone and we need to ear more voices.
>> 
>> Enrico
>> 
>> Il Mer 17 Nov 2021, 19:28 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> I think we should have a PIP for this. Because this impacts all the
>>> developers who are making documentation changes.
>>> 
>>> - Sijie
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:46 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi -
>>>> 
>>>> There are two efforts happening in the community around website refresh.
>>>> 
>>>> (1) Docusaurus upgrades.
>>>> (2) New web design.
>>>> 
>>>> There is an effort to eliminate all the extra commits in the asf-site
>>>> branch of the main repository. In that thread I proposed a new repository
>>>> for the website.
>>>> 
>>>> We can then discuss migration and development both on this mailing list
>>>> and as PRs and Issues in that repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Do we want to have a PIP process here or can we be less formal? I think
>>>> that PRs. Issues, and simple commits can be sufficient.
>>>> 
>>>> Unless there are objections I will create a new repository - pulsar-site
>>>> on Friday in 72 hours.
>>>> ‘
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to