Totally agree

PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 於 2021年12月12日 週日 08:28 寫道:

> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>于2021年12月11日 周六15:28写道:
>
> > At this point, if 2.9.0 is non stable, I think we should fast-forward
> > to 2.9.1 which will include security fix. Though, we should start
> > 2.9.1 right now.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <mme...@apache.org>
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 - thanks Enrico.
> > >
> > > - Michael
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > la 11. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.07 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > > kirjoitti:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello folks,
> > > > > Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0.
> > > > > I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and update the
> > website
> > > > > before announcing 2.9.0.
> > > > > My plan is to complete the procedure next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to prepare
> > the first
> > > > > RC of 2.9.1, due to the log4j bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you are aware of problems on branch-2.9 or things to be
> > cherry-picked
> > > > > because they are blocker please let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Otherwise if branch-2.9 is stable I will cut the RC from what we
> > already
> > > > > have now.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am volunteering as RM for 2.9.1 as I followed 2.9.0 and release
> is
> > > > > basically non stable due to the bugs we discovered after completing
> > the
> > > > > VOTE and publishing the artifacts to dockerhub and Maven
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Enrico
> > > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to