It can be the case that releases are not announced. For example with Tomcat a version which fails to pass the vote is skipped.
Let’s not announce 2.9.0 and go on to 2.9.1. Maybe there’s some website fixes to hide 2.9.0. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2021, at 5:28 PM, PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > Another point is we have not announced the 2.9.0 release yet. > > This will make users feel confused that a new release from the Pulsar > community with the > serious problem(log4j bug) but after the log4j has fixed the issue and > provided the new release. > > I think we'd better contain the fix in 2.9.0 and 2.9.0 also has a critical > bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > which will lead the topic stop to provide services for more than 5min. It > looks like, hey, we have a new release here but > it has critical security issues and known serious bugs which will seriously > affect the core features. > > From the perspective of release, yes, the release vote has closed. But I > believe that users will not care about this matter, > they only care about the quality of the products we provided. > > I would like to hear your views. > > Regards, > Penghui > > > >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:26 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am starting 2.9.1 on Monday >> >> Enrico >> >> Il Dom 12 Dic 2021, 02:19 陳智弘 <thomasec...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >>> Totally agree >>> >>>> PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 於 2021年12月12日 週日 08:28 寫道： >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Penghui >>>> >>>> Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>于2021年12月11日 周六15:28写道： >>>> >>>>> At this point, if 2.9.0 is non stable, I think we should fast-forward >>>>> to 2.9.1 which will include security fix. Though, we should start >>>>> 2.9.1 right now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matteo Merli >>>>> <mme...@apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall < >>> mmarsh...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 - thanks Enrico. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> la 11. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.07 Enrico Olivelli < >> eolive...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> kirjoitti: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello folks, >>>>>>>> Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0. >>>>>>>> I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and update >> the >>>>> website >>>>>>>> before announcing 2.9.0. >>>>>>>> My plan is to complete the procedure next week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to >> prepare >>>>> the first >>>>>>>> RC of 2.9.1, due to the log4j bug. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you are aware of problems on branch-2.9 or things to be >>>>> cherry-picked >>>>>>>> because they are blocker please let me know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Otherwise if branch-2.9 is stable I will cut the RC from what >> we >>>>> already >>>>>>>> have now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am volunteering as RM for 2.9.1 as I followed 2.9.0 and >> release >>>> is >>>>>>>> basically non stable due to the bugs we discovered after >>> completing >>>>> the >>>>>>>> VOTE and publishing the artifacts to dockerhub and Maven >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Enrico >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
