Hi Mattison, I'm not sure if this is the current behavior, I left a comment in the PR
Thanks, Bo Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> 于2022年12月28日周三 16:27写道： > > I agree with you. > > Please note that the new test case is about non-persistent topics > > is it expected ? > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 28 dic 2022 alle ore 07:58 Yubiao Feng > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > Hi qiang > > > > I think this is a necessary fix, and it would be nice if more explicit > > errors were given to the client. > > > > Thanks > > Yubiao > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:43 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, All > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion of this behaviour change as follow. > > > > > > The issue is described here: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19085 > > > And the fix PR here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19086 > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Behaviour change: > > > > > > Before: we can create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > After: we will get `PulsarClientException.TopicDoesNotExistException` when > > > we create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > Please feel free to leave comments if you have any concerns. > > > > > > Best, > > > Mattison > > >
