Hi Mentors, As I was going through the license verification for the next release (1.20) , I happened to see this http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ (which I'm calling the export license page)
Pulsar 1.20 release introduces encryption (as an optional feature), and it uses Bouncycastle, and we were planning on including the Bouncy* jars in the binary. Many Apache projects using Bouncycastle as listed on the export license page. Do we need to list it Pulsar on the export license page now? If so, how do we get it into there? Or should we just remove the BouncyCastle jars from the distribution and leave it optional, letting users install it if needed? Users will need to install it for building Pulsar from source. They wont need it for running Pulsar, unless they use encryption. What's the guidance on this? Cheers, Joe
