>The idea is that one can issue a curl command with payload to a Pulsar
>Function running inside a Pulsar cluster and have the function work on the
>payload.

This is a stateless function?  It can run on any framework that can execute
a function - whats specific about this to need Pulsar?

Joe

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjee...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
> There have been requests for triggering a Pulsar Function just like one can
> curl an AWS Lambda.
> There can be several modes using different mechanisms that can be
> supported. Just wanted to get community feedback around this.
> The idea is that one can issue a curl command with payload to a Pulsar
> Function running inside a Pulsar cluster and have the function work on the
> payload. The output of the function, if any, should be the response of the
> curl command.
> There are several considerations
> 1. Since Pulsar Functions consume from a topic, should we publish the
> message to the incoming topic. What if a function consumes from multiple
> input topics. In that case which topics should we publish on? Also note
> that publishing on input topic will also affect other consumers beside the
> function in consideration.
> 2. What is the side-affects of running functions this way. For example if
> they modify any counters, that would be globally seen. Is this reasonable
> behavior? What about any outputs being published to output topic?
> 3. What is the best mechanism to implement such a functionality? If
> side-effects are ok, then publish/consume is probably the easiest way to
> implement it. Alternatively one can send the payload via grpc from the
> brokers to the function instance to have it triggered. The state
> side-effects concerns still exist in this scenario.
>
> Any other concerns? Feedback is welcome.
> Thanks!
>

Reply via email to