>Thorsten Ziehm wrote On 07/06/06 09:28,: > >> Hi, >> >> nearly the full set of automated testscripts ran on m173 (Windows, >> Linux, Solaris Sparc and Solaris x86) and they found some regressions. >> But the number is not so high. The evaluation of the errors and >> warnings in the test results will take some more days. But it seems >> that the >> general quality of OOo is still good.
I'm using m173 for some time and no problems so far too... [...] >> But this will also mean, that we need more QA by >> the OOo community on the current builds as well. [...] >> Thorsten Hi Thorsten, about this QA: I think I can do more that I'm doing (confirming/finding duplicated/closing issues). I requested access to TCM but after that I read somewhere (and I can't find the page right now), that TCM is only for some languages (excluding mine: pt-br)... and as I can't find no test to do in TCM to my idiom, I'm thinking that TCM is not for me... am I right ? Some weeks ago, I tried to use qatesttool (automated tests), but after contacting some developers about errors that I found (.res files) I found that those errors are already known and that I could safety ignore them. Well... let me know how can I help the community, as I have a machine that can be used at least 6h/day for this (qatesttool, tcm, etc.). Thank you. -- Flávio Henrique --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
