Andre Schnabel wrote:
Correct .. but at the moment I still rather use testtool to analyze errors, as I can see the information in context (doubleklcick onb error line will bring be to the corresponding code lines in the testscript).

Yes, you are right. The testtool is well made.

For emacs accustomed guys like me, the following magical spell
within emacs will take them to the corresponding code.

 Esc x compile RET
 perl translate_res_file.pl --with-file gallery.res RET
 Ctrl-s error:
 Ctrl-c Ctrl-c

Why i prefer to use such command line tools is that the machine where
the testtool is running is located remotely through the Internet.
The automation test takes hours. During the test I can go to other place.

But using your tools, I only need to anlyce one (the failed) file .. not all 21 :-)

Good.

Ciao,
Tora

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to