Tora wrote: > Andre Schnabel wrote: >> Correct .. but at the moment I still rather use testtool to analyze >> errors, as I can see the information in context (doubleklcick onb >> error line will bring be to the corresponding code lines in the >> testscript). > > Yes, you are right. The testtool is well made. > > For emacs accustomed guys like me, the following magical spell > within emacs will take them to the corresponding code. > > Esc x compile RET > perl translate_res_file.pl --with-file gallery.res RET > Ctrl-s error: > Ctrl-c Ctrl-c > > Why i prefer to use such command line tools is that the machine where > the testtool is running is located remotely through the Internet. > The automation test takes hours. During the test I can go to other place. > >> But using your tools, I only need to anlyce one (the failed) file .. >> not all 21 :-) > > Good. Thank you for these tools. I am EMACS 'stupid' but may decide to become smart. I am working my way through BASE because of the high number of false errors that are reported due to the imporper use of functions to open and close windows. At least that is the situation on the Mac OS X platforms. I will work through the issues and feedback corrected files.
James McKenzie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
