1. what's the mechanism - if theres one - between the qatrack and TCM
(which I suppose is the testing environment, at least it's the one I
know of and where I do my digging) ? Or is it just the qa person,
ticking off his or her checkboxes? Whats the rules of the game?
In the list in qatrack.org/ooo there's quite a lot of entries with
untested status and no person responsible for qa (quality absence;?) .
Who's qa person for slovenian language for instance - I have my
suspicions (g), but I guess there must be some kind of a list -
TiA
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
QATrack is meant to provide a replacement for the Status page with some
filtering capabilities (more are coming) and with the ability for the
Native-Lang QA leads like you to set the status of every build in their
language ("untested", "in qa", "approved", "rejected" and so on).
Moreover, you will be notified by e-mail every time a new Polish build
is added.
See http://www.qatrack.org/ooo and this mailing list archive for more.
Ask Andre' Schnabel, CC: me, in order to have an account set up in
QATrack.
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
