Vito Smolej wrote: > what's the mechanism - if theres one - between the qatrack and TCM > (which I suppose is the testing environment, at least it's the one I > know of and where I do my digging) ? Or is it just the qa person, > ticking off his or her checkboxes?
Qatrack and TCM are separated systems: TCM is used for testing, Qatrack is used for release approvals. There is no interaction at the moment. In general, there could be some interaction between Qatrack and TCM (and IZ) but the different authentication systems make it harder. There are, however, plans to implement some communication in Qatrack (links to TCM reports, links to IZ). > In the list in qatrack.org/ooo there's quite a lot of entries with > untested status and no person responsible for qa (quality absence;?) . The large number of untested builds is due to the tool being new. Just a few QA leads decided to request access for OOo 2.0.4. We are seeing some more for OOo 2.1, and more will gradually follow. So if a build is marked as UNTESTED this doesn't mean that it has not been tested at all; maybe it has, but the relevant NL project is not using Qatrack yet. Regards, Andrea Pescetti. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
