Re: [qa-dev] Filing l10n bugs

[Clytie Siddall]

Thanks for your reply, Christian. :)

On 13/12/2006, at 8:59 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:

On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:09:29PM +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:

[...]
I have found that the date formats are incorrect (Calc > Format >
Cell) and have enquired on the l10n list about how to fix them. We
will need to decide the correct strings within our project, probably
also consulting with community members outside the project. So I
think this should be a formal bug.

When I go to file the issue, I am unsure whether I should choose the
l10n component or the vi component.

it changed, along with the requested formats, then use l10n

If it is for a "poll", then I'd use vi, if it if for the request to have

OK.

But please check

http://l10n.openoffice.org/nonav/i18n_framework/cldr/ LocaleDataAudit_OOo202.html

first and see whether CLDR has correct data or not.

Hmm, lots of contradictions, and some parts are not quite correct. I'll review this.

However, the vi component only lists versions up to 2.0, and only has
the "www" subcomponent.

Yes, this doesn't really matter. Don't file issues concerning the
product itself to vi component, only those that are dealt with inside
your project.

OK, that is clear now.

So I'm asking:

1. under which component (and CC whom) should I log issues specific
to our vi project

specific to your project: vi. But when you ask "cc whom", then you're
probably not meaning something related to your project, but to the
localization. In that case, use l10n.

OK.

2. how do I update the version and subcomponent list for the vi project

Ask the QA-Leads for it

I've emailed Maho. :)




http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN

Is there a default QA-leads email address one should use, rather than personal email addresses? from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part