On 11/01/2007, at 10:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Clytie Siddall wrote:However, I wonder if we _do_, in fact, need a sync'd page to display the qatrack results.No. QATrack is also meant to be a replacement for the old "QA Status" page.Currently, don't you need a qatrack account to view the release status of builds?No, that page is public, as clarified in the one-line documentation at http://www.qatrack.org/ooo
Thanks for reminding me of that. I suppose, because I have always been updating my data, and thus had to login, I assumed the whole thing was login-only.
I think it would be useful to have a public overview of builds' release status, so everyone involved can keep track. Can we sync the results to a public, read-only HTML page?As you discovered yourself, if you don't login with username and password the QATrack View page is exactly this. Actually, it is still dynamic (so it cannot be a drop-in replacement for the current Status page since PHP is not supported on the main OOo web site) and it needs better filtering (which is being worked on and will be available soon; speed will also increase as a consequence).
It's very good as it is: please don't take this mail as any criticism of qatrack. Quite the opposite: I want everyone to be able to see it, if they want!
Thanks also to Joost for changing the l10n link to point to qatrack. Now it will show our current progress. :)
from Clytie (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team / nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/vi-VN
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
