Hi Louis, *,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 04:38:41PM -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> On 2007-01-12, at 15:18 , Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:59:17PM -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> >>[...]
> >
> >If the LGPL is authoritative license decision, then I'll remove all  
> >the
> >stuff I added there.
> 
> I kind of expected this reaction.

Well, then why did you change it? SCNR :-)

> You will note that the claims on  
> the copyright page state that on the one hand the authors have  
> copyright and on the other that the license is LGPL.  We can modify  
> the text so that it simply states, "Copyright complies with the OOo  
> license as stated in www.openoffice.org/license.html".

You don't see that it is not about loosing my rights. It is about not
granting others more rights than intended. It is about limiting
confusion. It is about avoiding legal traps. (If you cannot comply with
the license you put your own stuff under, then this is a pretty dumb
situation)

My 0,02€ is:

* Not everything has to be "free" to use by anybody with no restrictions
  whatsoever
* I don't think we need a license for the stuff in the wiki
* I don't think that a license makes sense for stuff in the wiki [1]
* Plain copyright (authors retain all rights on their contribution for
  "other use") with a statement like
  "By contributing to the wiki, you agree that your stuff will be
  changed/modified by others. You agree as well that your contribution
  (or compilations/modifications thereof) can be published under the
  same terms and conditions as on the main OOo-site (read: PDL)."
  Intent:
  * No license to obey for the wiki, no legal rules apart common sense
    and fair use/attribution (of course the contributor is expected to
    have the necessary rights on the stuff that is contributed
  * Free editing and copying of stuff around in the wiki
  * Possibility to publish & use stuff on OOo under PDL

Note the difference between reserving the right to apply a license later
and putting it under that license from the very beginning.

But I agree that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the best place for this discussion

[1] If a license makes sense to be applied, then the stuff should not be
placed in the wiki, but on the main OOo-Site

ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: Thumb - Break Me

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to