Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Kay, *,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:20:01AM +0100, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
wrote:
Bernd Eilers wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
[...]
I fear, that turnaround times are too high. So, OOo builds from scratch
on a local Linux box in under an hour, which nearly is "real time" :-)
Under one hour? Than these are not "from scratch" builds, right (or are
missing binfilter or other stuff)? (or some multi-processor system)
these are from scratch builds, excluding the check out and configure
steps, without nas and mozilla (--disable-mozilla --without-nas ) while
building concurrently using the "hardlink" option of deliver (build
--all --dlv_switch -link -P4 -- -P4). The box is a two CPU dual core
Opteron thing, with some gigs of RAM.
I
don't know how fast e.g. Mac can build?!
Tinderbox also keeps track of average (median) build-times (Build-times
however include creating the shadowtree and updating the tree to a cws)
The tinderbox-Mac's build-time is about 130-150 minutes
Thanks, good to know.
[...]
Speaking about buildbots: TERMITE is now also visible in EIS you can
find that at the menu at "MISC / Termit Main Page". There are Wiki
entries for Termite and Tinderbox on OOoWiki.
Is there are fundamental difference between tinderboxes and buildbots?
The most fundamental difference is that buildbots are told by a
buildmaster-server what to build and that for this reason the buildbots
need a steady internet-connection to the buildmaster.
The presentation of the results is fundamentally different from the
tinderbox one as well. (less useful for a cws-based model, more oriented
to a one-tree-only system)
I think I understand ... thanks.
ciao
Christian
Kay
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
