It just looks to me something has happened between n-1st and the latest RC (070905 enUS) : the problem, that...

a)  ... I reported first on dec 2nd 2006 as issue 72209
b) ...was declared once (or twice) AS DESIGNED (! - this is a beauty, worth of Kafka) c) ... got pushed around and/or (under the table/into the future) a few times

has finally been solved (looks like to me) . >>KudoZ to whoever took care of it.<< When I opened the issue in December (223 I guess it was), I did not know if I should not make it a P2 aka show stopper. I did not - I guess everybody's dream is to have such a gotcha, so's mine as well, so that gave me a push for P3. Looks like nobody got hurt in the meantime. But it could turn into a real stinker

Questions:
i) I did not include everybody and his grandma in the cc. Should I? Is there a list of "1-800" names, one could/should cc to? I know, I know, it says "USE SPARINGLY" in big letters across the top - but it would help to have it. ii) How am I supposed to know when to raise hell and when not? Or (equivalent) how much?

TiA
Vito

Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,

Peter Hillier-Brook schrieb:
Alex Fisher wrote:
Exporting to PDF does not add the correct extension, rather leaves it as .odt. As pointed out by the reporter, this could very easily lead to data loss.

It had been closed with "FIXED", but targeted for 2.3.1. Seems the intent is to release 2.3.0 with this bug included. IMO, not good enough.

I have re-opened the issue (which, BTW had not been seen by any of the QA project - no oooqa keyword) and set the oooqa keyword.

Could others please check it out.

It might be helpful if a more rigorous definition of the problem could be provided. I feel quite deprived at my inability to provoke this problem with OOo 2.3 rc2 on Win XP? Everything works as expected: no extension on the suggested file name, PDF suggested as the file format and a correctly formed PDF file as the result!

Maybe you are using the OOo file dialogs instead of the nativ Windows dialogs? The problem is only present with windows native dialogs (what is the default setting).

Thanks, André; that explains everything. I much prefer the OOo dialogues and now I'm supported by a good reason. :-)

Peter HB

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to