Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Maho,
I see. Thanks, in any case I recommend filing issue. Otherwise
we cannot keep track what happens, even though it is *NOT*
actually trigger the real processes.
you are right. I promise to do it better next time. ;-(
So - Marcus, what is your opinion for approval issues? Is it relevant?
Is it redundant?
They are is still needed.
AFAIK the items in QATrack are used to keep an overview about the
current status of every listed build. But "approved" status does't mean
it will be published on mirrors (more or less) automatically. Maybe the
NL team would like to release all possible builds at the same time due
to a press announcement and therefore has to wait until all are approved?
Furthermore, I cannot look every 5 min. into QATrack just to see that a
another build was approved that should now be released to the mirrors. ;-)
Therefore a separate issue is still necessary to tell which builds
should now be really released to the mirrors.
Also, with a query in Issuezilla you can get an overview which builds
(or better languages) are really released.
cf. http://blog.livedoor.jp/maho_nakata/archives/51348609.html
In my opinion, keeping two identical info are problematic.
With the thoughts from above I don't see it as identical. At least for
me there is a clear difference.
Best regards
Marcus
From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:28:59 +0100
Hi Maho,
I wrote no specific issue for this. But the distribution is tracked in
QATrack.
Ciao
Marcus
Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Marcus, and Jean-Baptiste
thank you very much, I'm very appreciated!
Anyway which issue is related to this release process?
Thanks again!
From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:00:18 +0100
Hi Maho,
yes, in my previous post of course I mean "now available". ;-)
Best regards
Marcus
Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi
I guess you mean
http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/3.2.0rc5_20100202/OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100202_MacOSXPowerPC_install.dmg
?
From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:42:37 +0100
Hi,
the build is no available for download on the websites.
Best regards
Marcus
Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hello Jean-Baptiste
many thanks as PowerPC package provider. how you will have
done should be formalized so that others can take over.
thanks
From: Jean-Baptiste Faure <jbf.fa...@laposte.net>
Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:37:05 +0100
Le 10.03.2010 09:43, Marcus Lange a écrit :
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le 09.03.2010 23:07, Marcus Lange a écrit :
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Ok, I have added a second tests scenario for MacOS PPC to papayes
in FR
category. He will read test description in French and do the tests
on
en_US version.
Tests (Release Sanity scenario) done (assignment ID : 8385). One
Fail
found as in FR version, on test 109172.
so, in other words the test was successful and the build is
approved?
If it was FR build I would want a second test to confirm. But if you
do
not have a second tester I think you can consider that other approved
PPC builds help to approve this one.
then I think a single test must be enough.
So, thanks a lot for your help and of course to the tester. :-)
Best regards
Marcus
You're welcome :-)
JBF
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qa.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qa.openoffice.org
