From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Please record as an Issue (Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:13:59 +0100
> Hi Maho, > > OK, I've filed 110113 for this purpose. > Hi Marcus and JBF, Thanks, verifIed. Best, > > > Maho NAKATA wrote: >> I'd like to ask Marcus and Jean-Baptiste about filing issue about PPC >> Mac >> 3.2.0 release process. Something like following. >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109277 >> it is not too late. better than nothing. I can do it but >> it is not appropreate I'm just a build provider. >> >> I belive recording is very important. I also add some comments >> about your ML thread. It is very informative. >> From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com> >> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:53:45 +0100 >> >>>> I see. Thanks, in any case I recommend filing issue. Otherwise >>>> we cannot keep track what happens, even though it is *NOT* actually >>>> trigger the real processes. >>> you are right. I promise to do it better next time. ;-( >> I belive it is not too late...I'm not sure we will have a release >> version >> for 3.2.1...We only have a record in this ML or my blog entry. It >> won't be >> an official one. >>>> So - Marcus, what is your opinion for approval issues? Is it relevant? >>>> Is it redundant? >>> They are is still needed. >> I see. >> >>> AFAIK the items in QATrack are used to keep an overview about the >>> current status of every listed build. But "approved" status does't >>> mean it will be published on mirrors (more or less) >>> automatically. >> "automatically" is the key point. If we can automatically feed >> approval >> into issue list or something like that, we can reduce some efforts. >> >>> Maybe the NL team would like to release all possible >>> builds at the same time due to a press announcement and therefore has >>> to wait until all are approved? >> Yes - this is the case of JA team, too. >> >>> Furthermore, I cannot look every 5 min. into QATrack just to see that >>> a another build was approved that should now be released to the >>> mirrors. ;-) >> I see. >>> Therefore a separate issue is still necessary to tell which builds >>> should now be really released to the mirrors. >>> >>> Also, with a query in Issuezilla you can get an overview which builds >>> (or better languages) are really released. >>> >>>> cf. http://blog.livedoor.jp/maho_nakata/archives/51348609.html >>>> In my opinion, keeping two identical info are problematic. >>> With the thoughts from above I don't see it as identical. At least for >>> me there is a clear difference. >> ok, thanks >> Best regards, >> Nakata Maho >> >>>> From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com> >>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:28:59 +0100 >>>> >>>>> Hi Maho, >>>>> >>>>> I wrote no specific issue for this. But the distribution is tracked in >>>>> QATrack. >>>>> >>>>> Ciao >>>>> >>>>> Marcus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maho NAKATA wrote: >>>>>> Hi Marcus, and Jean-Baptiste >>>>>> thank you very much, I'm very appreciated! >>>>>> Anyway which issue is related to this release process? >>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>> From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>>>> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:00:18 +0100 >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Maho, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes, in my previous post of course I mean "now available". ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maho NAKATA wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>> I guess you mean >>>>>>>> http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/3.2.0rc5_20100202/OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100202_MacOSXPowerPC_install.dmg >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@sun.com> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:42:37 +0100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the build is no available for download on the websites. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maho NAKATA wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello Jean-Baptiste >>>>>>>>>> many thanks as PowerPC package provider. how you will have >>>>>>>>>> done should be formalized so that others can take over. >>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Faure <jbf.fa...@laposte.net> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:37:05 +0100 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 10.03.2010 09:43, Marcus Lange a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 09.03.2010 23:07, Marcus Lange a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I have added a second tests scenario for MacOS PPC to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> papayes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in FR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> category. He will read test description in French and do the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> en_US version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tests (Release Sanity scenario) done (assignment ID : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8385). One >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found as in FR version, on test 109172. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so, in other words the test was successful and the build is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved? >>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was FR build I would want a second test to confirm. But if >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>> not have a second tester I think you can consider that other >>>>>>>>>>>>> approved >>>>>>>>>>>>> PPC builds help to approve this one. >>>>>>>>>>>> then I think a single test must be enough. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, thanks a lot for your help and of course to the tester. :-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You're welcome :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> JBF > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qa.openoffice.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qa.openoffice.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qa.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qa.openoffice.org
