Hello Charles,

Am 15.05.2010 14:24, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> (I hope it's the right list to post this message)
> 
> On Thursday and Friday Sophie and I met with the Ubuntu OOo
> maintainers. The topic was how we could enhance our cooperation in
> the light of the lower quality of the Ubuntu OOo builds. We also had
> the opportunity to discuss this with the Novell/Go-OOo team and we
> believe we have come up with a global analysis and the beginning of
> the solution.

i hope you have some success. i try also to come in contact with the
maintainers of the different distributions in Germany.
> 
> Ubuntu does compile OOo from the vanilla source, using the ooo-build
> system and applying their patches in a non-systematic way. Which
> essentially means they get the worst of both worlds ;) ...

I do the experience that the Ubuntu Maintainer also takes the patches
from Debian. and in the result the OpenOffice.org from Go-OO, from
Debian and from ubuntu are different.

> We pointed the Ubuntu team to the various bug reports we (in the fr
> project for instance) had received and how it was unappropriate,
> unpractical and not understandable for our users to differentiate
> between builds and branches. In any case it appeared that the
> reported bugs were not easily identifiable as having their roots in
> the build system, the upstream or the patches. We have therefore
> proposed two things :
> 
> - that we open a new category or subcategory on our own IZ to enable
> a direct communication of bugs and issues between Ubuntu and us (the
> upstream project) - that the Go-OO team moves to our own IZ and that
> both branches get a common reporting platform, a common visibility
> (and perhaps a common treatment).

At this time I take the Ubuntu maintainer into CC if I found out, that
something is an Ubuntu only problem. if we need a new (sub-) category
then we need it for all different distribution. I think this isn't
practicable. I think it is more important to communicate to get a better
quality in the distribution version.

I'm very interested to take part at such discussions.

Kind regards


Mechtilde

-- 
Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann
## http://de.openoffice.org
## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA
## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris
## Meine Seite http://www.mechtilde.de
## PGP encryption welcome! Key-ID: 0x53B3892B


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to