I think they're used by xdoclet/generama, for instance (which in turn provide abstract testcase for their plugins so they can check generated code against expected code, and ant tasks to generate some code).These dependencies (ant and junit) should probably be marked as optional, then.
Just my 2 unverified cents, -g 2009/2/17 Robert Scholte <[email protected]> > Last time I noticed that the dependencies are missing their scope. > > Both junit and jmock should have the test-scope. > > It seems there's some lost class in the sourcefolder, which depends on > junit, namely com.thoughtworks.qdox.junit.APITestCase > there are no references to this class, so I would nominate it for deletion. > > And I guess the ant-dependency should be at least 1.5.1 and optional > But wait a minute... isn't com.thoughtworks.qdox.ant.AbstractQdoxTask just > as lost? Ok, it has some tests, but that's the only usage I can find. > another nomination? > > regards, > > Robert > > ------------------------------ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN > Messenger<http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/> >
