I've changed three scopes to 'provided'. It means that they won't
cascade to Maven user's deps transitively. It also blurs the
distinction between 'test' and 'compile'.
Thoughts?
Regards,
- Paul
On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Grégory Joseph wrote:
I think they're used by xdoclet/generama, for instance (which in
turn provide abstract testcase for their plugins so they can check
generated code against expected code, and ant tasks to generate some
code).
These dependencies (ant and junit) should probably be marked as
optional, then.
Just my 2 unverified cents,
-g
2009/2/17 Robert Scholte <[email protected]>
Last time I noticed that the dependencies are missing their scope.
Both junit and jmock should have the test-scope.
It seems there's some lost class in the sourcefolder, which depends
on junit, namely com.thoughtworks.qdox.junit.APITestCase
there are no references to this class, so I would nominate it for
deletion.
And I guess the ant-dependency should be at least 1.5.1 and optional
But wait a minute... isn't
com.thoughtworks.qdox.ant.AbstractQdoxTask just as lost? Ok, it has
some tests, but that's the only usage I can find.
another nomination?
regards,
Robert
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
