Hmm, well ive ended up back in the lab for a bit longer afterall, so...
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:09 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: > William Henry wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > My non-voting comment. Thanks for letting me weigh in :) > > > > I like that it is clean. I like the feather. > > +1 > > > I'm not fond of the 'Q'. It reminds me of a request-reply call - the arrow > > goes out and comes back. > > Another fairly geeky interpretation would be that it is reminiscent of a > circular data structure like a circular buffer or a circular queue. > Not sure if im the only one but i dont particularly ever try to interpret logos, I just go by what looks nice not whether its trying to represent hehe (out of interest, anyone know what the Apache feather is all about anyway? :P I have no idea, but i think its nice hehe)... I didnt like any of the Q's in particular, but id probably say its nicer than some of the others now. I tried playing around with the feather on the Q but it didnt do anything for me...theres just somthing about Q, it never really looks nice :) > I do think the font choice could use some improvement, not that I know > enough about fonts to make a better suggestion. Certainly not an area i know anything about either, and wasnt something id have any real control over without starting from scratch....i just chose to play around with the 3rd example logo because i thought it was getting the short end of the stick with its lack of colour :) > > In general though I think this direction for the logo has a lot of promise. > > --Rafael
