2009/6/10 Andrew Wright <atwri...@mac.com>: > +1 > > Coming at qpid from a JMS perspective we found some initially-surprising > behaviour before we discovered this parameter. > > Of course it can be changed for performance reasons if needed later. > > Cheers, > Andrew
Hi Andrew, I see you're a fellow mac user (though I go by my Apache address on the list). Are you using Qpid on the Mac? Can you tell us more about your usage of Qpid? Would be interested to know what the experience was like. I'm keen to get OS X supported as a 1st class citizen in the Qpid world but don't have much call for the platform in my work life. As a result progress is quite slow. Cheers Martin > On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:53, Martin Ritchie wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just wanted to generate some discussion on peoples thoughts around >> changing the Java prefetch from its current 5000 value to 1. >> >> Having a default of 1 will work for all users and prevent users from >> hurting themselves when they use priority queues or TTL and expect >> things to just work. >> >> If users know what they're messaging profile is and so know what they >> are doing then they can set the maxprefetch to a higher value. >> >> Thoughts/ Comments? >> >> Martin >> >> -- >> Martin Ritchie >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation >> Project: http://qpid.apache.org >> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > -- Martin Ritchie --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
