On 09/09/2009 09:33 AM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
Should tests and examples be in the same namespace, or different
namespaces?
If we're going to do this, I'd suggest different namespaces. Perhaps
qpid::test and qpid::example?
Jonathan
Thinking about examples and not sure if they should be in a qpid::example
namespace. We don't want to imply that users should put their code in a qpid
namespace, and it changes name resolution a bit which could create some
confusion, e.g. if an example is missingn a using declaration that would be
required by code not in a qpid:: namespace.
I'm 100% in favour of a test namespace, and I think the original motivation was
about tests not examples.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]