Alan Conway wrote:
Thinking about examples and not sure if they should be in a
qpid::example namespace. We don't want to imply that users should put
their code in a qpid namespace, and it changes name resolution a bit
which could create some confusion, e.g. if an example is missingn a
using declaration that would be required by code not in a qpid::
namespace.
I'm 100% in favour of a test namespace, and I think the original
motivation was about tests not examples.
I misunderstood the original proposal then, I thought he meant to put
both in the same namesapce.
I like your proposal - put the tests in a namespace, but not the examples.
Jonathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
