On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:02 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Robert Godfrey wrote: > > ... > > I'm looking to get everything working on a the same port tonight... the > > other tasks are less high priority I think. > > This sounds very encouraging. It would be good to have the Java Broker > speaking 0-10 for the upcoming release. Do you think it would be > reasonable to land the branch in time? I imagine it would be preferable > to get it in and stabilized rather than let it diverge over the course > of the release.
Given that it sounds like you've introduced no regressions to the java broker, I'd much rather have it landed on the trunk sooner (in the next few days) and then fixed up on trunk, rather than leaving it later and risking java not being in the 0.6 release at all. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
