OK - given the opinion on here I'll aim to get the 0-10 Java work onto trunk this weekend sometime.
My apologies in advance if I inadvertently break any tests... thing have been passing on my machine(s) but some of the Java client tests are, shall we say, a little temperamental :-) I'll also post something about the differences that I know about between the AMQP interpretation on the Java broker and the C++ broker... Principally I think these were relating to the handling of credit on message.release, and whether it is allowed to "release" non-acquired messages. Finally thanks to all those who originally put 0-10 in the Java client... most of the work was already done for me - this was mostly a task of removing 0-8isms from the Broker code. Cheers, Rob 2009/10/22 Andrew Stitcher <[email protected]> > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:02 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > Robert Godfrey wrote: > > > ... > > > I'm looking to get everything working on a the same port tonight... > the > > > other tasks are less high priority I think. > > > > This sounds very encouraging. It would be good to have the Java Broker > > speaking 0-10 for the upcoming release. Do you think it would be > > reasonable to land the branch in time? I imagine it would be preferable > > to get it in and stabilized rather than let it diverge over the course > > of the release. > > Given that it sounds like you've introduced no regressions to the java > broker, I'd much rather have it landed on the trunk sooner (in the next > few days) and then fixed up on trunk, rather than leaving it later and > risking java not being in the 0.6 release at all. > > Andrew > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > >
