Looks fine to me.

Rajith

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Aidan Skinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Robert Godfrey <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Aidan,
>>
>> Why did you remove the setting of the linked exception here:
>
> Slippy fingers and tired eyes while looking at the diff. I'll put it back. :)
>
>> Also, we probably want to communicate the stack trace somehow in
>>
>> ---
>> a/qpid/java/client/src/test/java/org/apache/qpid/client/protocol/AMQProtocolHandlerTest.java
>> +++
>> b/qpid/java/client/src/test/java/org/apache/qpid/client/protocol/AMQProtocolHandlerTest.java
>> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ public class AMQProtocolHandlerTest extends TestCase
>>                 }
>>                 catch (Exception e)
>>                 {
>> -                    e.printStackTrace();
>>                     fail(e.getMessage());
>>                 }
>>             }
>>
>> although I would think that just not catching the exception here would
>> probably do it...
>
> Yeah, not catching is probably the right thing to do there.
>
> - Aidan
> --
> Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love http://qpid.apache.org
> "A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Rajith Attapattu
Red Hat
http://rajith.2rlabs.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to