On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 18:17 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Whilst I obviously agree the change I mentioned certainly isn't 'critical' or > worth respinning for, I am disappointed you'd consider doing another spin to > pick up the .net patches without remove that 1 stray character. >
I think it's a little tricky. I have no experience base to judge how low risk a change in the java area is, so this naturally makes me more conservative there. Also, the changes I'm allowing in wouldn't really require retesting anything outside c++ clustering and the dotnet client. In theory adding in your changes means retesting java too, which is a much larger thing to retest. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
