Hi, +1 for the idea of getting rid of backport-util-concurrent jar As a curiosity, did anybody run any kind of test with Emmanuel's patch for upgrading to Mina 1.1.7 - is this change bringing any noticeable improvement?
Thanks, Sorin On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com>wrote: > If we upgrade to mina 1.1.7 then we could easily get rid of > backport-util-concurrent.jar. > With the changes I proposed in QPID-2629 we reduce this a bit further as > well. > > For the client release, if we don't ship the tests then with the above > changes we could get somewhere close to ~ 2.3 MB. > Here's the break down. > > 532K build/lib/qpid-client-0.7.jar > 32K build/lib/mina-filter-ssl-1.0.1.jar > 4.0K build/lib/plugins > 1.4M build/lib/qpid-common-0.7.jar > 24K build/lib/qpid-all.jar > 308K build/lib/mina-core-1.0.1.jar > 28K build/lib/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar > 16K build/lib/slf4j-api-1.4.0.ja > > Rajith > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Joshua Kramer <j...@globalherald.net> > wrote: > > > >> would expect a message queue client to be not bigger than ~500KB > >> (dependencies included and fully compressed with pack200+lzma) > > > > 500KB would be nice. Some of my "science experiments" target Java-based > > platforms with 1MB of Flash and 1MB of RAM. For now I open sockets to a > > server, and the server in turn does any queue manaement things as needed. > > > > http://www.maxim-ic.com/products/microcontrollers/tini/ > > > > Cheers, > > -JK > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > -- Sorin S
