On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Martin Ritchie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 June 2010 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the same test against the Java >> broker to compare the performance? > > If you do have time it would be good if you could run it on the 0-91 > protocol as well as the 0-10. 0-10 support is new and so not as well > tested. > > You can do this by excluding 0-10 support at startup. > > qpid-server -p 5672 --exclude-0-10 5672 >
The c++ perftest will only work with 0-10 protocol. So you really can't run that against the 0-91 version. > Cheers > > Martin > > >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> >> Le 02/06/2010 15:24, Jin a écrit : >>> >>> Hi All: >>> >>> I did a perf test on May/19/2010 from Qpid trunk. >>> >>> hardware : intel i920 4G RAM >>> >>> OS: linux 2.6.32. >>> >>> GCC: 4.5.0 >>> >>> >>> >>> on same system, the 29west UMDS's performance: >>> >>> >>> This test is just for internal reference. Please don't put it into >>> public access. >>> >>> Jinius. >> >> >> > > > > -- > Martin Ritchie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
