On 2 June 2010 15:02, Rajith Attapattu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Martin Ritchie <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2 June 2010 14:42, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the same test against the Java >>> broker to compare the performance? >> >> If you do have time it would be good if you could run it on the 0-91 >> protocol as well as the 0-10. 0-10 support is new and so not as well >> tested. >> >> You can do this by excluding 0-10 support at startup. >> >> qpid-server -p 5672 --exclude-0-10 5672 >> > > The c++ perftest will only work with 0-10 protocol. > So you really can't run that against the 0-91 version.
Ah sorry didn't notice it was a cpp test. >> Cheers >> >> Martin >> >> >>> Emmanuel Bourg >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 02/06/2010 15:24, Jin a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi All: >>>> >>>> I did a perf test on May/19/2010 from Qpid trunk. >>>> >>>> hardware : intel i920 4G RAM >>>> >>>> OS: linux 2.6.32. >>>> >>>> GCC: 4.5.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> on same system, the 29west UMDS's performance: >>>> >>>> >>>> This test is just for internal reference. Please don't put it into >>>> public access. >>>> >>>> Jinius. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Ritchie >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation >> Project: http://qpid.apache.org >> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > -- Martin Ritchie --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
