jiridanek commented on a change in pull request #346:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/346#discussion_r770837283



##########
File path: cpp/src/link_test.cpp
##########
@@ -23,9 +23,114 @@
 #include <proton/sender_options.hpp>
 #include <proton/receiver_options.hpp>
 #include <proton/container.hpp>
+#include <proton/connection.hpp>
+#include <proton/connection_options.hpp>
+#include <proton/listen_handler.hpp>
+#include <proton/listener.hpp>
+#include <proton/messaging_handler.hpp>
+#include <proton/types.hpp>
+#include <proton/message.hpp>
+#include <proton/target_options.hpp>
+#include <proton/source_options.hpp>
+#include <proton/delivery.hpp>
 
 #include <iostream>
 
+#include <map>
+#include <condition_variable>
+#include <mutex>
+#include <thread>
+
+namespace {
+std::mutex m;
+std::condition_variable cv;
+bool listener_ready = false;
+int listener_port;
+} // namespace
+
+class test_recv : public proton::messaging_handler {
+  private:
+    class listener_ready_handler : public proton::listen_handler {
+        void on_open(proton::listener &l) override {
+            {
+                std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(m);
+                listener_port = l.port();
+                listener_ready = true;
+            }
+            cv.notify_one();
+        }
+    };
+
+    std::string url;
+    proton::listener listener;
+    listener_ready_handler listen_handler;
+
+  public:
+    test_recv(const std::string &s) : url(s) {}
+
+    void on_container_start(proton::container &c) override {
+        listener = c.listen(url, listen_handler);
+    }
+
+    void on_message(proton::delivery &d, proton::message &msg) override {
+        proton::symbol sym = "symbol";
+        proton::value val = "value";
+        std::map<proton::symbol, proton::value> props = 
d.receiver().target().dynamic_node_properties();
+
+        ASSERT(!props.empty());
+        for(auto it=props.begin(); it!=props.end(); it++) {
+            ASSERT_EQUAL(sym, it->first);
+            ASSERT_EQUAL(val, it->second);
+        }
+        d.receiver().close();
+        d.connection().close();
+        listener.stop();
+    }
+};
+
+class test_send : public proton::messaging_handler {
+  private:
+    std::string url;
+    proton::sender sender;
+
+  public:
+    test_send(const std::string &s) : url(s) {}
+
+    void on_container_start(proton::container &c) override {
+        proton::target_options opts;
+        std::map<proton::symbol,proton::value> m({{proton::symbol("symbol"), 
proton::value("value")}});
+        opts.dynamic_node_properties(m);
+        sender = c.open_sender(url, proton::sender_options().target(opts));
+    }
+
+    void on_sendable(proton::sender &s) override {
+        proton::message msg;
+        msg.body("message");
+        proton::tracker t = s.send(msg);
+        s.connection().close();
+    }
+};
+
+int test_dynamic_node_properties() {
+
+    std::string recv_address("127.0.0.1:0/test");
+    test_recv recv(recv_address);
+    proton::container c(recv);
+    std::thread thread_recv([&c]() -> void { c.run(); });
+
+    // wait until listener is ready
+    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(m);
+    cv.wait(lk, [] { return listener_ready; });
+
+    std::string send_address =
+        "127.0.0.1:" + std::to_string(listener_port) + "/test";
+    test_send send(send_address);
+    proton::container(send).run();
+    thread_recv.join();
+
+    return 0;

Review comment:
       there is a lot of tests that have this basic structure, but differ in 
details (depending on what function of API is currently being tested). I am 
wondering if they could be somehow refactored. But that is not here nor there 
for this PR.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to