Ah, I see... that explains what I'm seeing :) Thanks,
Paul. ---- http://colby.id.au On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/28/2011 06:34 AM, Paul Colby wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Just wondering, what is the official status of CMake support in Qpid? >> >> It seems to me (I know very little about CMake) that the existing >> SWIG-based bindings are not being built by CMake, despite the presence >> of CMakeList.txt files... is this just because they're still a work in >> progress, or because I'm a CMake n00b? ;) >> >> PS - I'm not bothering to report the actual CMake issues I'm seeing, >> since this is no CMake support group... just tell me if it's supposed >> to work, and if so, I'll figure it out ;) >> > > The current status of CMake is that it is incomplete. It doesn't do > packaging, it doesn't build some parts of the system like cluster, swig and > probably others. It does what the windows project needs it to do, and beyond > that nothing is guaranteed. At some point we need to bring cmake up to speed > and _delete_ the automake system so people cannot continue to extend it and > are forced to fix any remaining issues in cmake. I don't think anyone has > had the time or the willpower to take that on to date, and the job keeps > getting bigger (I'm as guilty as anyone of extending automake and forgetting > cmake.) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
