Is there any sort of info available on the implications of the move... e.g. will we still easily be able to refer to the history for our current svn repo?
-- Rob On 30 November 2011 17:29, Carl Trieloff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > A pilot has been done already, this is a wider group, so I would look at > it as do we want to be in the second wave of projects to GIT, or wait it > out. > > from what I see infra has a solid handle on GIT from the projects that > have switched already > > Carl. > > > On 11/30/2011 11:09 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > > So, I'm not a git user, though I dare say I could learn... but I must > admit > > that I'd prefer not to be part of the pilot group and wait for others to > > sort out any issues encountered before we consider moving across... > > therefore I'd personally be -1 for moving in the trial... but ok for > moving > > at a later point. > > > > -- Rob > > > > On 30 November 2011 16:37, Alan Conway <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 11/28/2011 05:28 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > >> > >>> After some more discussion, let's take a straw poll. I know many people > >>> are > >>> using git already. If "many" accounts for most of our contributors, we > >>> should > >>> really consider making the transition. > >>> > >>> > >> +1 for git > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > >> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > >> Project: http://qpid.apache.org > >> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.**apache.org< > [email protected]> > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > >
