On 11/30/2011 11:48 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Is there any sort of info available on the implications of the move... e.g.
will we still easily be able to refer to the history for our current svn
repo?
All the history will carry over into git. Even personal git repo's have the full
history and IMO its easier and faster to work with the history in a git repo
than in SVN.
-- Rob
On 30 November 2011 17:29, Carl Trieloff<[email protected]> wrote:
A pilot has been done already, this is a wider group, so I would look at
it as do we want to be in the second wave of projects to GIT, or wait it
out.
from what I see infra has a solid handle on GIT from the projects that
have switched already
Carl.
On 11/30/2011 11:09 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
So, I'm not a git user, though I dare say I could learn... but I must
admit
that I'd prefer not to be part of the pilot group and wait for others to
sort out any issues encountered before we consider moving across...
therefore I'd personally be -1 for moving in the trial... but ok for
moving
at a later point.
-- Rob
On 30 November 2011 16:37, Alan Conway<[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/28/2011 05:28 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
After some more discussion, let's take a straw poll. I know many people
are
using git already. If "many" accounts for most of our contributors, we
should
really consider making the transition.
+1 for git
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.**apache.org<
[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
