On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote:
On 25 June 2012 20:06, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote:
The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two
audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything
that might ever want to speak AMQP, and a more specialized, vertical
audience of people interested in a particular message broker.
I accept that we have distinct audiences. I'm not, however, at ease with
binding "Qpid" to "a particular message broker" and "Proton" to the future,
and there being only two things, the old and the new.
I don't think that is what I was saying, nor how you could reasonably
draw that inference. I would be equally supportive of Rajith's
suggestion of setting up a qmf list.
I apologize. I very much don't mean to say that's your outlook. I mean
to say that the absence of a defined hierarchy could easily make it look
that way, and thus develop that way.
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
