On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 01:14:05PM -0400, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > I'm +1 on this. > > I think we should also consider a separate JIRA instance to go with > this, so users of these lists could report issues related to these > libraries etc. Not sure what we should use as the project name though. > Proton might be a bit limiting as it should cover the Messaging API > etc..
Would qpid-proton not be clear enough, or would having qpid in the name be confusing to people? -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpDi8onU0Ipn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
