On 07/13/2012 07:36 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
We should probably have a general discussion about what we want to do as a project going forward. While it's difficult to nail down a set strategy as a lot of pieces are still evolving, an honest dialogue about what we would want "QPid" to become is a good thing to have.
Always true! However my point was that we don't need to tie that to the naming (or existence) of the proposed list.
As I understand it there is a desire for a proton list. Though there may not be complete clarity on the scope of proton or its relationship to other pieces in the Qpid picture, I think it would at least be clear what that list was for.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
