Exactly. Thank you, Andrew.

On 7/23/12 11:40 AM, "Andrew Stitcher" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 11:26 -0400, Joseph Ottinger wrote:
>> What do you mean? I don't know what the proton devs would need to do
>> to support cmake -- the deliverables would be the same regardless of
>> the build system, or can be made to be identical.
>
>I think you are talking at cross purposes here.
>
>Steve is pointing out that those who work on the code base would have to
>learn to use another build system - maven. Irrespective of whether you
>can make its output identical to the cmake it's another thing to learn
>to work productively on the code.
>
>I think that Joseph is talking about the impact on developers who are
>using that code.
>
>I would point out that in the case of C code using maven brings a very
>large build dependency (java) that isn't the case for cmake. Obviously
>if you are building java that isn't important since you must have java
>anyway.
>
>Also cmake is not just a build system, in the comparison with autotools
>(autoconf and automake) it covers both configuration and build. I don't
>know enough about maven to know if it similarly covers both of these
>roles. I'd suspect given its java heritage that it is much weaker on the
>configuration aspect if it supports it.
>
>Andrew
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Steve Huston <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>> > Forgive my naiveté wrt Maven, but Qpid C++ currently uses cmake (and
>> > autoconf, but that's got a limited lifespan). It would be nice to
>>limit
>> > the number of build systems we need to maintain. I know proton is not
>> > Qpid, but the knowledge and setups needed is one more thing C++ devs
>>would
>> > need to take care of if working on proton. Is there any support on the
>> > proton devs part of using cmake for the C++ part?
>> >
>> > -Steve
>> >
>> > On 7/23/12 9:41 AM, "Joseph Ottinger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I was wondering if it'd be valuable to convert the build for proton to
>> >>maven. It's not a "rocket surgery" conversion - it involves moving
>> >>files and just a touch of configuration - but at the same time,
>> >>there're a lot of benefits.
>> >>
>> >>For better or for worse, there're two dominant build systems in Java;
>> >>one is Ant, the other Maven. Maven is winning, because Ant's not
>> >>*really* a build system - it's a scripting engine that people use for
>> >>builds, while Maven is a build system for realz, yo. Maven means a
>> >>regular lifecycle for the build, including explicit testing,
>> >>packaging, distribution phases; ant allows those things but doesn't
>> >>help you create them, and Maven has standards for them.
>> >>
>> >>Maven's set of tools is also very useful; again, you can do the same
>> >>things with Ant if you try, but few developers really care a lot about
>> >>having done stuff in the build system. They'd rather focus on the
>> >>project, not the build. With Maven, we can slap Arquillian into the
>> >>build (for example) and have a full module/integration/system test as
>> >>part of the build process, instead of bolting such things into place.
>> >>
>> >>Maven's also cross-language. Proton isn't just Java, of course; Maven
>> >>means we can use C++ and still have only one build process (within
>> >>certain reason; I'm not claiming Maven's the equivalent of autoconf,
>> >>because duh, but then again, autoconf is SOOOOO much fun....)
>> >>
>> >>I'm more than willing to convert the build over if desired; the java
>> >>part's already done, I'd still need to do the C++ conversion but it
>> >>would be pretty easy.
>> >>--
>> >>Joseph B. Ottinger
>> >>http://enigmastation.com
>> >>Ça en vaut la peine.
>> >>
>> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to