I personally prefer the simple ant based system. The last time Qpid used maven it was horrible :) .. it downloaded the entire universe into my computer. We also had trouble doing repeatable builds. Now I don't know if it was due to the way Maven was used or if it was an issue with Maven itself. I've never had issues with ant before --- it always worked for me :) With Maven it wasn't particularly a pleasant experience. So I'm biased there and please don't blame me for that.
Having said that, I'm not going to make a fuss, if the majority wants Maven ! One more thing. Converting the build system to maven is fine, but who ever does that should also take the responsibility of maintaining it as well :) To a certain extent that was also an issue with the previous attempt at using maven. Rajith On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Oleksandr Rudyy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I completely support Joseph's proposal to use maven as building system > for j-poton module. > > Kind Regards, > Alex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
