> On Feb. 14, 2013, 2:25 p.m., Philip Harvey wrote:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/CMakeLists.txt, line 77
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9433/diff/1/?file=258587#file258587line77>
> >
> >     If I understand correctly, we are only calling Maven from CMake as a 
> > short term hack, and in the longer term we'll replace the Maven call with 
> > pure CMake configuration. This is so that people without access to Maven 
> > can build and test Proton.
> >     
> >     If I'm correct, then I think this merits a comment here.

Scratch that,  just re-read the comment. Replacing maven with cmake is fine. 
It's keeping both that is a pain. I recommend the transition be swift and 
ruthless, otherwise you'll end up dragging two build systems forever like Qpid 
does.


- Alan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9433/#review16579
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 13, 2013, 7:41 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9433/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2013, 7:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid and Mary Hinton.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The smallest useful example I could devise to illustrate the possibilities.
> 
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-238 for more info
> 
> 
> This addresses bug PROTON-238.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-238
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/CMakeLists.txt 1445761 
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/trunk/proton-c/CMakeLists.txt 
> 1445761 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9433/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> linux only so far.  Minimally the PYTHONPATH will require a ';' separator in 
> Windows.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cliff Jansen
> 
>

Reply via email to