Done.

(As I'm sure is obvious from the JIRA and commit traffic, I also merged
some other small bug fixes and improvements in keeping with the previous
'break it you fix it' discussion)

Robbie

On 20 May 2013 11:24, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:

> Please go ahead.  If we end up being ready, I'll produce the new RC later
> today.
>
> Justin
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Robbie Gemmell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In case it isn't clear that was me effectively asking permission, as I'd
> > rather not merge code changes to the branch unless they are going to be
> > included.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 17 May 2013 16:56, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Justin,
> >>
> >> In some final testing of the Java broker we came across an issue we feel
> >> warrants blocker status, and so would like to request another RC be cut
> on
> >> Monday before calling the vote in order to allow including the fix in
> the
> >> release.
> >>
> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4858
> >> http://svn.apache.org/r1483866
> >>
> >> There are more specifics on the JIRA, but the short story is that due to
> >> changes made in this development cycle it became possible to configure
> the
> >> brokers HTTP management port(s) in an ambiguous way that suggested SSL
> was
> >> in use on the port when it was not, a situation we would obviously like
> to
> >> prevent for reasons.
> >>
> >> The change is fairly simple and involves removal of some inconsistency
> in
> >> configuration between the HTTP and non-HTTP ports, removing the
> ambiguity
> >> that lead to the issue. Aside from the obvious security-related benefit,
> >> making the change in this release would also be beneficial to avoid a
> need
> >> for explicit handling of the configuration change during upgrades to
> future
> >> releases.
> >>
> >> Robbie
> >>
> >> On 16 May 2013 22:46, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, everyone.  Here is RC4 from revision 1483543:
> >>>
> >>>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.22-rc4/
> >>>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.22-rc4-testing.txt
> >>>
> >>> My testing on Fedora 16 x86-64 produced no failures.  Once again,
> >>> thanks to all those who have tested previous RCs and reported the
> >>> outcome.  Mick has posted to the list about some low-frequency
> >>> failures in repeated test runs.  Those are important, but they are not
> >>> at this point considered blockers for the release.
> >>>
> >>> My plan now is to let RC4 settle for a few days and wait for any signs
> >>> of trouble.  If all goes well, I'll start the release vote on Monday
> >>> next week and close it that Friday.
> >>>
> >>> This release candidate is signed.  The bits in RC4, if approved for
> >>> release, will be the GA bits.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Justin
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> 0.22 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/022-release.html
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to