Justin,

Thanks for approval.
The fix (r1485163) was merged into 0.22 branch.

Kind Regards,
Alex


On 22 May 2013 13:09, Oleksandr Rudyy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> I am wondering whether you have already cut RC5?
>
> If not, I would like to request the inclusion of changes made in revision
> http://svn.apache.org/r1485163 fixing QPID-4876. It is a one line change
> which does not effect core broker functionality but it could potentially
> save a lot of cursing and  user frustration when making mistakes on adding
> of Virtual Host into Java Broker dynamically :)
>
> If RC5 is already cut then it is fine  to not include the changes into
> 0.22.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> On 20 May 2013 14:08, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Done.
>>
>> (As I'm sure is obvious from the JIRA and commit traffic, I also merged
>> some other small bug fixes and improvements in keeping with the previous
>> 'break it you fix it' discussion)
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 20 May 2013 11:24, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Please go ahead.  If we end up being ready, I'll produce the new RC
>> later
>> > today.
>> >
>> > Justin
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > In case it isn't clear that was me effectively asking permission, as
>> I'd
>> > > rather not merge code changes to the branch unless they are going to
>> be
>> > > included.
>> > >
>> > > Robbie
>> > >
>> > > On 17 May 2013 16:56, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Justin,
>> > >>
>> > >> In some final testing of the Java broker we came across an issue we
>> feel
>> > >> warrants blocker status, and so would like to request another RC be
>> cut
>> > on
>> > >> Monday before calling the vote in order to allow including the fix in
>> > the
>> > >> release.
>> > >>
>> > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4858
>> > >> http://svn.apache.org/r1483866
>> > >>
>> > >> There are more specifics on the JIRA, but the short story is that
>> due to
>> > >> changes made in this development cycle it became possible to
>> configure
>> > the
>> > >> brokers HTTP management port(s) in an ambiguous way that suggested
>> SSL
>> > was
>> > >> in use on the port when it was not, a situation we would obviously
>> like
>> > to
>> > >> prevent for reasons.
>> > >>
>> > >> The change is fairly simple and involves removal of some
>> inconsistency
>> > in
>> > >> configuration between the HTTP and non-HTTP ports, removing the
>> > ambiguity
>> > >> that lead to the issue. Aside from the obvious security-related
>> benefit,
>> > >> making the change in this release would also be beneficial to avoid a
>> > need
>> > >> for explicit handling of the configuration change during upgrades to
>> > future
>> > >> releases.
>> > >>
>> > >> Robbie
>> > >>
>> > >> On 16 May 2013 22:46, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi, everyone.  Here is RC4 from revision 1483543:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.22-rc4/
>> > >>>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.22-rc4-testing.txt
>> > >>>
>> > >>> My testing on Fedora 16 x86-64 produced no failures.  Once again,
>> > >>> thanks to all those who have tested previous RCs and reported the
>> > >>> outcome.  Mick has posted to the list about some low-frequency
>> > >>> failures in repeated test runs.  Those are important, but they are
>> not
>> > >>> at this point considered blockers for the release.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> My plan now is to let RC4 settle for a few days and wait for any
>> signs
>> > >>> of trouble.  If all goes well, I'll start the release vote on Monday
>> > >>> next week and close it that Friday.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> This release candidate is signed.  The bits in RC4, if approved for
>> > >>> release, will be the GA bits.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks!
>> > >>> Justin
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ---
>> > >>> 0.22 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/022-release.html
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to