I don't really object to including this. Can we have someone with batch script skills take a quick look at it?
Justin On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Oleksandr Rudyy <[email protected]> wrote: > Justin, > > I hope it is still not too late to request the inclusion into 0.22 of a > minor fix for Windows batch script to start Java Broker ( > http://svn.apache.org/r1485859 QPID-4881). > > We introduced new command line arguments requiring to pass an equal > character as part of the argument but the batch script splits the command > line argument with 'equal' into two arguments and removes equal character. > Such arguments have to be quoted but processing of quoted arguments > resulted in the errors. > > The changes fixed the processing of quoted arguments. It is a minor issue > and there are some workarounds but I would like to request the inclusion of > the fix as it is quite trivial. > > Kind Regards, > Alex > > > > On 23 May 2013 22:40, Ken Giusti <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Justin, >> >> A new RC, you say? >> >> Well, I'll just leave this little tidbit here, ya know, just in case: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4883 >> >> /backs slowly away from my keyboard.... >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Justin Ross" <[email protected]> >> > To: [email protected] >> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:34:58 AM >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.22 >> > >> > This vote is withdrawn. We'll have a new RC later today. The only >> > new change will be the cmake build fix. Once that's available, I'll >> > start a new vote thread. >> > >> > Justin >> > >> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Okay, we'll fix it tomorrow. >> > > >> > > On May 22, 2013 4:09 PM, "Darryl L. Pierce" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:54:50PM -0400, Justin Ross wrote: >> > >> > RC5 contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.22. >> > >> > >> > >> > If you favor making the RC5 bits into our official release, vote +1. >> > >> > If you have reason to believe RC5 is not ready for release, vote -1. >> > >> > >> > >> > I will close this vote on Monday, 22 May. I know that's a little >> > >> > brief, but I have some vacation time coming up soon, and I'm hoping >> to >> > >> > finish the release before I leave. >> > >> >> > >> The patches for 4344 were applied in reverse on this branch and, with >> > >> the last cherry-pick, the bindings/CMakeLists.txt broke the CMake >> > >> changes. The conditional check for Swig < 1.3.32 is still in the file >> > >> and needs to be deleted to fix CMake. >> > >> >> > >> This is totally my fault. >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. >> > >> Delivering value year after year. >> > >> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. >> > >> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> -- >> -K >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
