----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15353/#review28679 -----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Broker.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15353/#comment55614> [Just my personal preference] I think it would be clearer to make this: pagingDir(conf.pagingDir.empty() ? dataDir : conf.pagingDir) and make the code in the queue factory simply new PagedQueue(... broker->getOptions().pagingDir...) In other words the paged queue code itself doesn't know how the paging dir is selected it just uses the directory it is told. It also means that the broker code has the correct paging directory from the start if that is needed in the future. [This is just my aesthetic sense though, and the code isn't problematic as it is] - Andrew Stitcher On Nov. 11, 2013, 12:30 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15353/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 12:30 p.m.) > > > Review request for qpid. > > > Bugs: QPID-5316 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5316 > > > Repository: qpid > > > Description > ------- > > Adds a new option as suggested on user list, in order to control where the > paging files go speartely from the other data-dir stuff. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/DataDir.cpp 1540676 > /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Broker.h 1540676 > /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Broker.cpp 1540676 > /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/QueueFactory.cpp 1540676 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15353/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Gordon Sim > >
