[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14099933#comment-14099933
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-6009:
-----------------------------------
Personally I think the system properties are now redundant (although they are
still used by the tests - but we could actually fix that using context
defaulting I think).
As you state we can allow configuration at the port level by restricting the
available protocols, and if a system administrator wishes to remove a protocol
entirely they can simply remove the protocol plugin (admittedly that doesn't
give you the ability to selectively remove 0-8, 0-9 or 0-9-1 while retaining
the others - however given they similarity between these variants, I'm not sure
there is any real utility in removing only some of these at a system rather
than port level).
> [Java Broker] Add meta data to managed attributes to provide information
> where valid values are restricted
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-6009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6009
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Rob Godfrey
> Assignee: Rob Godfrey
>
> For some configured object types, the valid values for some attributes differ
> between different implementation types (one example would be the valid
> combinations of protocols on Ports). Information on valid values for such
> attributes could be provided in the annotation and then provided to the UI
> through the meta data servlet.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
